BC Private Investigator overview

BC Private Investigator: Privacy Act, recording and surveillance limits

B.C.'s statutory tort of violation of privacy, its exceptions, eavesdropping and surveillance, use of a name or portrait, one-party consent to record under Criminal Code section 184, filming from public places, GPS trackers and criminal harassment.

  • 13 questions
  • Topic drill
0/13
Privacy Act, recording and surveillance limits · Question 1Score 0/0

Can a lawful public-interest publication excuse how the information was gathered under the Privacy Act?

Study reference: B.C. private investigator law and public guidance (Oct 2026), Ch. 6 Privacy Act and surveillance law — Privacy Act ss. 1–4; Criminal Code ss. 184, 264; Ontario PI Study Guide Section 3 (industry privacy standards)

All 13 questions in this test

Every question and its answer choices. The correct answers and explanations appear when you take the test above.

  1. Can a lawful public-interest publication excuse how the information was gathered under the Privacy Act?

    1. Yes, if the client is a public company
    2. Yes, a public-interest story excuses any method used to gather it
    3. No, it does not cover acts that themselves violated privacy
    4. Yes, if a newspaper prints it first
  2. A PI records their own phone interview with a witness without saying so. Is that an offence under s. 184?

    1. Yes, unless a judge approved it first
    2. Yes, both people must always agree
    3. Yes, if the witness lives in another province from the investigator
    4. No, a party to the call can consent to the recording
  3. When may a PI attach a GPS tracker to a vehicle?

    1. When the client is the subject's spouse
    2. When the vehicle is parked on a street
    3. With the vehicle owner's permission
    4. Whenever the driver is the subject
  4. May a PI secretly record a phone call between two other people?

    1. No, without a party's consent it is a crime
    2. Yes, if the PI holds a full licence
    3. Yes, if the PI keeps the recording private
    4. Yes, if the call concerns insurance fraud
  5. Which situation is listed as an exception to a Privacy Act violation?

    1. Surveillance done by any licensed investigator
    2. Conduct done on behalf of a large employer
    3. Surveillance done for an insurance company
    4. Conduct consented to by a person entitled to consent
  6. What is the best practice for audio when filming surveillance video?

    1. Record without audio
    2. Record audio but delete it later
    3. Always record audio for context
    4. Record audio only at night
  7. Does the Privacy Act's exception for investigating crime cover private investigators?

    1. Yes, but only for insurance fraud files handled by licensed firms
    2. No, it covers peace and public officers
    3. Yes, if the PI has a firm licence
    4. Yes, any licensed PI is covered
  8. A subject goes to a funeral during surveillance. What does industry practice advise?

    1. Use judgment, as privacy concerns are higher there
    2. Record the eulogy for the client
    3. Film the subject closely, since a cemetery is a public place
    4. Approach the subject to ask questions
  9. How is the degree of privacy a person is entitled to decided under the Privacy Act?

    1. The same fixed rules for every situation
    2. Whatever the PI's client is willing to pay to find out about them
    3. Whatever the person says they expect
    4. What is reasonable in the circumstances
  10. What does B.C.'s Privacy Act make actionable without proof of damage?

    1. Wilfully violating another's privacy without a claim of right
    2. Any photograph of any person taken in a public place, for any purpose
    3. Any phone call made to a wrong number
    4. Any accidental view of a neighbour's yard
  11. Where may a PI usually film a subject without breaching privacy expectations?

    1. Inside a public washroom
    2. Through the bedroom window of their home
    3. From inside their fenced backyard
    4. In a public place, such as a street or park
  12. A PI firm puts a photo of a surveillance subject in its advertising. What may the subject do?

    1. Sue for unauthorized use of their portrait
    2. Nothing, since the photo was taken in public
    3. Only ask for a credit line under the photo
    4. Only complain to the advertising council
  13. Can surveillance violate privacy under B.C.'s Privacy Act even without trespass?

    1. No, only entering land can violate privacy
    2. Only if the subject is a public official
    3. Yes, surveillance can violate privacy without trespass
    4. Only if the PI uses a hidden microphone or a camera inside the home

Privacy Act, recording and surveillance limits: key rules to remember

Our summary of what the official handbook says on this topic, in our own words. Read it before or after the practice questions above, then check the original chapter. Read the official chapter ↗

Tort of violation of privacy

  • It is a tort, actionable without proof of damage, to wilfully and without a claim of right violate another person's privacy.
  • The privacy a person is entitled to is what is reasonable in the circumstances, considering the lawful interests of others; courts look at the nature, incidence and occasion of the conduct and any relationship between the parties.
  • Privacy may be violated by eavesdropping or surveillance, whether or not there is a trespass.

Exceptions

  • Not a violation if: consented to by a person entitled to consent; incidental to lawful defence of person or property; authorized or required by B.C. law, a court or court process; or done by a peace officer or public officer investigating, if proportionate and not during a trespass.
  • Private investigators are not in the peace officer exception.
  • Publishing a matter of public interest or fair comment, or privileged publication, is not a violation, but this does not cover how the information was obtained.

Name or portrait; court

  • Using a person's name or portrait (still or moving likeness) to advertise or promote property or services without consent is a tort, actionable without proof of damage.
  • Privacy Act actions are heard in the B.C. Supreme Court.

Interception of private communications

  • Knowingly intercepting a private communication with an electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device is an offence (up to five years).
  • Exception: the interceptor has the express or implied consent of the person who sent the communication or the person intended to receive it (one-party consent).
  • So an investigator may record a conversation they take part in, but never one between other people without a party's consent.

Industry privacy standards (general practice)

  • A person in a public place has no reasonable expectation of privacy and may be filmed; at home they do; observe from the street or public property, never by entering their property to look in windows.
  • Use judgment at sensitive moments: bathrooms, gravesites, religious observances, when minors are present.
  • Best practice is to record video without audio; keep the original recording unaltered.
  • GPS trackers only with the vehicle owner's permission (for a company vehicle, the owner company may give written permission).

Criminal harassment risk

  • Repeatedly following someone or watching their home or workplace without lawful authority, causing reasonable fear, can be criminal harassment; surveillance must have a lawful purpose and stay proportionate.

Study the Privacy Act, recording and surveillance limits rules as flashcards →

Other topics

Full practice tests